How Much Land Does a Man Need Essay

Realism, as the word implies, deals with reality as its subject, that is, putting emphasis on what is happening in the real world, earlier than stressing emotions as a source of aesthetic experience. In literature, it often focuses on moral or estimable choices such that it gives emphasis on the actions by the characters rather than the actual plot of the story. Characters ar also portrayed with motive, more than often than non, in relation to the view of their social class. In realism, lurid and dramatic elements that are often found in naturalism and romances are avoided.The short stories The run and How Much Land Does a Man charter? are examples of literature in the style of realism which focuses on the ethical choices of the characters in relation to their social class. The Bet focuses on the materiality of the world. It gave contrasts to the moneymaking(a) world view of the banker, and the simplicity of the young man in the story. Although the inquiry at the beginning is whether or not the death penalty is worse than life imprisonment, the story has not given an answer to it (it was not its role to answer this anyway), exclusively rather, it presented views of morality.It altogether despises materiality. The young man at the revoke of the story proclaimed It is all worthless, fleeting, illusory, and deceptive, like a mirage I marvel at you who exchange heaven for earth. I dont inadequacy to understand you (Chekrov). Like The Bet, How Much Land Does a Man assume? criticizes the human sense impression of materiality. The story, however, shifts its focus on greed. It differs with The Bet in the sense that while How Much Land Does a Man Need? does not necessarily condemn acquiring material possession in this world, it presented a question of how much of this material possession does man really need. Pahom, the briny character in the story, was given the opportunity to acquire land of his own, but was overcome by greed many times throughout the story. In the end, this greed was the cause of his death. The moral of the story is that man should only fill what is necessary for living, nothing in excess. The story also implies that man cannot move in death what man possess in life.Works CitedChekrov, Anton. The Bet Tolstoy, Leo. How Much Land Does a Man Need